Best practices

  • Utilize sandbox data whenever possible for query development to avoid privacy checks and improve speed.

  • Minimize the likelihood of result set overlap between recently run queries by modifying key parameters.

  • Avoid running multiple queries where the end date is today, as this often leads to filtered rows.

  • Limit the number of times you query the same data by using tightly bound dates, disjoint sets, saved results, or temp tables.

  • Minimize the number of cross-user aggregations and rewrite queries to combine aggregations or split them into more focused queries.

The following best practices will provide you with techniques to develop privacy-centric and performant queries. For additional best practices specific to each privacy mode, see the following sections:

Develop queries on sandbox data

Best practice: Only query production data when you're in production.

Utilize sandbox data during your query development whenever possible. Jobs using sandbox data don't use any budget or affect query history to introduce future privacy redactions. Additionally, because of the lack of privacy checks, sandbox queries run faster, allowing for more rapid iteration during query development.

If you have to develop queries on your actual data (such as when using match tables), to make it less likely that you overlap rows, choose date ranges and other parameters which are unlikely to overlap for each iteration of your query. Finally, run your query over the range of data.

Don't query the same data more than necessary

Best practices:

  • Select tightly bound start and end dates.
  • Instead of querying overlapping windows, run your queries on disjoint sets of data, then aggregate the results in BigQuery.
  • Use saved results instead of re-running your query.
  • Create temp tables for each date range you're querying over.

Ads Data Hub restricts the total number of times that you can query the same data. As such, you should attempt to limit the number of times that you access a given piece of data.

Don't use more aggregations than necessary in the same query

Best practices:

  • Minimize the number of aggregations in a query
  • Rewrite queries to combine aggregations when possible

In Ads Data Hub, too many similar cross-user aggregate functions can lead to increased privacy error, and there is a limit of 100 aggregate functions in a subquery. Hence, overall we recommend writing queries that output more rows with focused grouping keys and fewer aggregate columns, rather than more columns with broad grouping keys and complex aggregations. The following pattern should be avoided:

SELECT
  COUNTIF(field_1 = a_1 AND field_2 = b_1) AS cnt_1,
  COUNTIF(field_1 = a_2 AND field_2 = b_2) AS cnt_2
FROM
  table

Queries that count events depending on the same set of fields should be rewritten using the GROUP BY statement.

SELECT
  field_1,
  field_2,
  COUNT(1) AS cnt
FROM
  table
GROUP BY
  1, 2

The result can be aggregated the same way in BigQuery.

Queries that create columns from an array and then aggregate them afterwards should be rewritten to merge these steps.

SELECT
  COUNTIF(a_1) AS cnt_1,
  COUNTIF(a_2) AS cnt_2
FROM
  (SELECT
     1 IN UNNEST(field) AS a_1,
     2 IN UNNEST(field) AS a_2,
   FROM
     table)

The previous query can be rewritten as:

SELECT f, COUNT(1) FROM table, UNNEST(field) AS f GROUP BY 1

Queries that use different combinations of fields in different aggregations can be rewritten into several more focused queries.

SELECT
  COUNTIF(field_1 = a_1) AS cnt_a_1,
  COUNTIF(field_1 = b_1) AS cnt_b_1,
  COUNTIF(field_2 = a_2) AS cnt_a_2,
  COUNTIF(field_2 = b_2) AS cnt_b_2,
FROM table

The previous query can be split into:

SELECT
  field_1, COUNT(*) AS cnt
FROM table
GROUP BY 1

and

SELECT
  field_2, COUNT(*) AS cnt
FROM table
GROUP BY 1

You can split these results into separate queries, create and join the tables in a single query, or combine them with a UNION if schemas are compatible.

Optimize and understand joins

Best practice: Use a LEFT JOIN instead of an INNER JOIN to join clicks or conversions to impressions.

Not all impressions are associated with clicks or conversions. Therefore, if you INNER JOIN clicks or conversions on impressions, impressions that aren't tied to clicks or conversions will be filtered from your results.

Four venn diagrams which represent left join, right join, inner join, and full outer join.

Account for zeroed user IDs

Best practice: Account for zeroed user IDs in your results.

An end-user's ID may be set to 0 for a number of reasons, including: opting out of ads personalization, regulatory reasons, etc. As such, data originating from multiple users will be keyed to a user_id of 0.

If you want to understand data totals, such as total impressions or clicks, you should include these events. However, this data won't be useful for deriving insights on customers, and should be filtered if you're doing such analysis.

You can exclude this data from your results by adding WHERE user_id != "0" to your queries.

Avoid reaggregation

Best practice: Avoid multiple layers of aggregation across users.

Queries that combine results that have already been aggregated, such as in the case of a query with multiple GROUP BYs, or nested aggregation, require more resources to process.

Often, queries with multiple layers of aggregation can be broken up, improving performance. You should attempt to keep rows at the event or user level while processing and then combine with a single aggregation.

The following patterns should be avoided:

SELECT SUM(count)
FROM
  (SELECT campaign_id, COUNT(0) AS count FROM ... GROUP BY 1)

Queries that use multiple layers of aggregation should be rewritten to use a single layer of aggregation.

(SELECT ... GROUP BY ... )
JOIN USING (...)
(SELECT ... GROUP BY ... )

Optimize for BigQuery

Generally, queries that do less perform better. When evaluating query performance, the amount of work required depends on the following factors:

If query execution isn't meeting your service level agreements, or you're encountering errors due to resource exhaustion or timeout, consider:

  • Using the results from previous queries instead of recomputing. For example, your weekly total could be the sum computed in BigQuery of 7 single day aggregate queries.
  • Decomposing queries into logical subqueries (such as splitting multiple joins into multiple queries), or otherwise restricting the set of data being processed. You can combine results from individual jobs into a single dataset in BigQuery. Although this may help with resource exhaustion, it may slow down your query.
  • If you're running into resources exceeded errors in BigQuery, try using temp tables to split your query into multiple BigQuery queries.
  • Referencing fewer tables in a single query, as this uses large amounts of memory and can cause your query to fail.
  • Rewriting your queries such that they join fewer user tables.
  • Rewriting your queries to avoid joining the same table back on itself.

Query advisor

If your SQL is valid but might trigger privacy issues, the query advisor surfaces actionable advice during the query development process, to help you avoid undesirable results.

To use the query advisor: