Understanding Security Posture
Stay organized with collections
Save and categorize content based on your preferences.
securityPosture
is the security evaluation of a device, determined by the current device status.
Current device status is determined by factors such as if the device has been rooted, if it is running a custom ROM, and more.
securityPosture
is broken down in the response into devicePosture
and an additional list of postureDetails
which contains the field securityRisk
.
The securityRisk
field gives an idea of why the device is not considered to be in the most secure state, while the advice
list can help perform actions to improve the security posture of the device.
For example:
{
"devicePosture": "POTENTIALLY_COMPROMISED",
"postureDetails": [
{
"securityRisk": "UNKNOWN_OS",
"advice": [
{
"defaultMessage": "The user should lock their device's bootloader."
}
]
},
{
"securityRisk": "HARDWARE_BACKED_EVALUATION_FAILED"
}
]
}
Evaluating Security Posture
By default, securityPosture
is evaluated using key attestation, specifically hardware-backed key attestation (HBKA) if applicable, providing a trustworthy security verdict as it generates and signs the attestation in secure hardware.
It may sometimes be the case that HBKA cannot be used for this evaluation. To reflect this, securityRisk
will return "HARDWARE_BACKED_EVALUATION_FAILED". This means that securityPosture
can be evaluated but not with HBKA, meaning that the device's boot integrity state could be compromised (e.g. the device could be rooted) and go undetected by software-based detection.
Understanding Security Posture Verdicts
Different combinations of devicePosture
and securityRisk
can be interpreted to understand the overall security of the device. Please be aware that the list below is not exhaustive:
- If
devicePosture
returns "SECURE" and securityRisk
returns "HARDWARE_BACKED_EVALUATION_FAILED" the device's integrity is secure, but this could not be confirmed by HBKA.
- If
devicePosture
returns "POTENTIALLY_COMPROMISED" and no securityRisk
result is returned, then HBKA is used in the evaluation and considers the device as compromised.
- If
devicePosture
returns "POTENTIALLY_COMPROMISED" and securityRisk
returns "HARDWARE_BACKED_EVALUATION_FAILED" then only software based checks could be performed, yet the integrity threat signals are strong enough to consider the device as compromised.
- If
devicePosture
returns "POSTURE_UNSPECIFIED" then the security evaluation could not be completed. We recommend waiting for the re-issuance of the HBKA, which occurs when a new verdict is returned, to see if it can return a specific value. However, it is expected for "POSTURE_UNSPECIFIED" to occur on initial install for a short period of time.
Android Management API to Play Integrity API mappings
The following table provides the mapping equivalence between AM API verdict and
the Play Integrity API verdict response.
Except as otherwise noted, the content of this page is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License, and code samples are licensed under the Apache 2.0 License. For details, see the Google Developers Site Policies. Java is a registered trademark of Oracle and/or its affiliates.
Last updated 2025-03-21 UTC.
[null,null,["Last updated 2025-03-21 UTC."],[[["\u003cp\u003e\u003ccode\u003esecurityPosture\u003c/code\u003e provides a security evaluation of an Android device based on factors like rooting, custom ROMs, and key attestation.\u003c/p\u003e\n"],["\u003cp\u003eIt uses \u003ccode\u003edevicePosture\u003c/code\u003e and \u003ccode\u003esecurityRisk\u003c/code\u003e fields to determine if a device is secure, potentially compromised, or if evaluation failed.\u003c/p\u003e\n"],["\u003cp\u003eHardware-backed key attestation (HBKA) provides a trustworthy security verdict, but software-based checks are used if HBKA fails.\u003c/p\u003e\n"],["\u003cp\u003eDifferent combinations of \u003ccode\u003edevicePosture\u003c/code\u003e and \u003ccode\u003esecurityRisk\u003c/code\u003e values offer insight into the specific security state of a device.\u003c/p\u003e\n"],["\u003cp\u003eThe Android Management API security verdicts have corresponding mappings to Play Integrity API verdict responses.\u003c/p\u003e\n"]]],["`securityPosture` evaluates device security based on factors like rooting or custom ROMs. It breaks down into `devicePosture` and `postureDetails`, the latter including `securityRisk` and `advice`. `securityRisk` highlights potential security issues. Evaluations use hardware-backed key attestation (HBKA) when possible; failures are marked by `HARDWARE_BACKED_EVALUATION_FAILED` in `securityRisk`. Different `devicePosture` and `securityRisk` combinations indicate varying security levels, such as \"SECURE\" with HBKA failure, or \"POTENTIALLY_COMPROMISED\". It also maps the AM API verdicts to the Play Integrity API.\n"],null,["# Understanding Security Posture\n\n[`securityPosture`](/android/management/reference/rest/v1/enterprises.devices#securityposture) is the security evaluation of a device, determined by the current device status.\nCurrent device status is determined by factors such as if the device has been rooted, if it is running a custom ROM, and more.\n\n`securityPosture` is broken down in the response into [`devicePosture`](/android/management/reference/rest/v1/enterprises.devices#deviceposture) and an additional list of [`postureDetails`](/android/management/reference/rest/v1/enterprises.devices#posturedetail) which contains the field [`securityRisk`](/android/management/reference/rest/v1/enterprises.devices#securityrisk).\n\nThe `securityRisk` field gives an idea of why the device is not considered to be in the most secure state, while the `advice` list can help perform actions to improve the security posture of the device.\nFor example: \n\n```gdscript\n {\n \"devicePosture\": \"POTENTIALLY_COMPROMISED\",\n \"postureDetails\": [\n {\n \"securityRisk\": \"UNKNOWN_OS\",\n \"advice\": [\n {\n \"defaultMessage\": \"The user should lock their device's bootloader.\"\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"securityRisk\": \"HARDWARE_BACKED_EVALUATION_FAILED\"\n }\n ]\n}\n```\n\nEvaluating Security Posture\n---------------------------\n\nBy default, `securityPosture` is evaluated using key attestation, specifically [hardware-backed key attestation (HBKA)](https://developer.android.com/training/articles/security-key-attestation) if applicable, providing a trustworthy security verdict as it generates and signs the attestation in secure hardware.\n\nIt may sometimes be the case that HBKA cannot be used for this evaluation. To reflect this, `securityRisk` will return \"HARDWARE_BACKED_EVALUATION_FAILED\". This means that `securityPosture` can be evaluated but not with HBKA, meaning that the device's boot integrity state could be compromised (e.g. the device could be rooted) and go undetected by software-based detection.\n\nUnderstanding Security Posture Verdicts\n---------------------------------------\n\nDifferent combinations of `devicePosture` and `securityRisk` can be interpreted to understand the overall security of the device. Please be aware that the list below is not exhaustive:\n\n- If `devicePosture` returns \"SECURE\" and `securityRisk` returns \"HARDWARE_BACKED_EVALUATION_FAILED\" the device's integrity is secure, but this could not be confirmed by HBKA.\n- If `devicePosture` returns \"POTENTIALLY_COMPROMISED\" and no `securityRisk` result is returned, then HBKA is used in the evaluation and considers the device as compromised.\n- If `devicePosture` returns \"POTENTIALLY_COMPROMISED\" and `securityRisk` returns \"HARDWARE_BACKED_EVALUATION_FAILED\" then only software based checks could be performed, yet the integrity threat signals are strong enough to consider the device as compromised.\n- If `devicePosture` returns \"POSTURE_UNSPECIFIED\" then the security evaluation could not be completed. We recommend waiting for the re-issuance of the HBKA, which occurs when a new verdict is returned, to see if it can return a specific value. However, it is expected for \"POSTURE_UNSPECIFIED\" to occur on initial install for a short period of time.\n\n### Android Management API to Play Integrity API mappings\n\nThe following table provides the mapping equivalence between AM API verdict and\nthe Play Integrity API verdict response.\n\n| [AM API DevicePosture](/android/management/reference/rest/v1/enterprises.devices#deviceposture) | [AM API Posture.Detail.SecurityRisk](/android/management/reference/rest/v1/enterprises.devices#PostureDetail.FIELDS.security_risk) | [Play Integrity API verdict equivalent](/google/play/integrity/verdicts#device-integrity-field) |\n|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| [`SECURE`](/android/management/reference/rest/v1/enterprises.devices#DevicePosture.ENUM_VALUES.SECURE) | [`SECURITY_RISK_UNSPECIFIED`](/android/management/reference/rest/v1/enterprises.devices#SecurityRisk.ENUM_VALUES.SECURITY_RISK_UNSPECIFIED) | `MEETS_STRONG_INTEGRITY` |\n| [`SECURE`](/android/management/reference/rest/v1/enterprises.devices#DevicePosture.ENUM_VALUES.SECURE) | contains: [`HARDWARE_BACKED_EVALUATION_FAILED`](/android/management/reference/rest/v1/enterprises.devices#SecurityRisk.ENUM_VALUES.HARDWARE_BACKED_EVALUATION_FAILED) | `MEETS_DEVICE_INTEGRITY` |\n| [`AT_RISK`](/android/management/reference/rest/v1/enterprises.devices#DevicePosture.ENUM_VALUES.AT_RISK) | contains: [`HARDWARE_BACKED_EVALUATION_FAILED`](/android/management/reference/rest/v1/enterprises.devices#SecurityRisk.ENUM_VALUES.HARDWARE_BACKED_EVALUATION_FAILED) | `MEETS_DEVICE_INTEGRITY` |\n| [`POTENTIALLY_COMPROMISED`](/android/management/reference/rest/v1/enterprises.devices#DevicePosture.ENUM_VALUES.POTENTIALLY_COMPROMISED) | contains: [`UNKNOWN_OS`](/android/management/reference/rest/v1/enterprises.devices#SecurityRisk.ENUM_VALUES.UNKNOWN_OS) | `MEETS_BASIC_INTEGRITY` |\n| [`POTENTIALLY_COMPROMISED`](/android/management/reference/rest/v1/enterprises.devices#DevicePosture.ENUM_VALUES.POTENTIALLY_COMPROMISED) | contains: [`COMPROMISED_OS`](/android/management/reference/rest/v1/enterprises.devices#SecurityRisk.ENUM_VALUES.COMPROMISED_OS) | `\u003cunset\u003e` |\n| [`POSTURE_UNSPECIFIED`](/android/management/reference/rest/v1/enterprises.devices#DevicePosture.ENUM_VALUES.POSTURE_UNSPECIFIED) | `\u003cany\u003e` | `\u003cunset\u003e` |"]]