关于大规模文章广告系列中的链接的提醒
使用集合让一切井井有条
根据您的偏好保存内容并对其进行分类。
2017 年 5 月 25 日,星期四
最近,我们发现贡献者帖子、访客帖子、合作伙伴帖子或联合发布帖子等文章中包含的垃圾内容链接数量有所增加。这些文章通常是由某个网站或以某个网站的名义撰写并发布在其他网站上。
如果此类文章可以非常有效地让其他网站的受众群体了解相关内容,或者为您的事业或公司建立知名度,我们并不反对。不过,如果此类文章的主要意图是为了大量构建旨在让读者返回到作者网站的链接,则会违反 Google 的链接操纵指南。下面是一些可能会导致文章违反上述指南的因素(如果做法比较极端的话):
- 在您的文章中堆砌含有大量关键字且指向您的网站的链接
-
在多个不同的网站上发布文章;或者,在几个不同的大型网站上发布大量文章
-
使用或雇用对所写主题一知半解的文章作者
-
在这些文章中使用相同或相似的内容;或者,完全复制您自己网站上的文章(在这种情况下,我们的建议是:除
rel="nofollow"
之外,也使用 rel="canonical"
。
如果 Google 检测到某个网站发布了包含垃圾内容链接的文章,这可能会改变 Google 对该网站的质量的看法,并可能会对该网站的排名造成不利影响。在接受和发布此类文章之前,相关网站应对其进行严格审查,并自问一些问题,例如:我是否认识此人?此人的内容是否适合我的网站的受众群体?文章中的内容是否实用?如果文章中包含具有可疑意图的链接,作者是否针对这些链接使用了 rel="nofollow"
?
如果有网站专为构建链接而撰写文章,Google 定会采取相应措施,因为这种行为会有损整个网络。如果是以构建链接为首要目的,文章的质量就可能会大打折扣,从而导致糟糕的用户体验。此外,网站站长也不想收到咄咄逼人或反复发来的“发布我的文章!”请求。对于此类情况,我们建议一律通过垃圾信息举报表单进行举报。最后,如果一个链接即表示一种认可,而您自己的网站所获得的认可大都是由您本人创造的,这会利于您的网站给用户留下最好的印象吗?就构建链接而言,我们建议最好将重心放在改善网站内容上,其他的一切(包括链接)自会随之而来(此处并无一语双关之意)。
发布者:Google 反垃圾网页团队
如未另行说明,那么本页面中的内容已根据知识共享署名 4.0 许可获得了许可,并且代码示例已根据 Apache 2.0 许可获得了许可。有关详情,请参阅 Google 开发者网站政策。Java 是 Oracle 和/或其关联公司的注册商标。
[null,null,[],[[["\u003cp\u003eGoogle discourages large-scale link building schemes through contributor or guest posts when the primary motive is link manipulation, not user value.\u003c/p\u003e\n"],["\u003cp\u003eArticles with excessive keyword-rich links, widespread publication across numerous sites, or low-quality, duplicated content may violate Google's guidelines.\u003c/p\u003e\n"],["\u003cp\u003eWebsites publishing such articles risk lower search rankings due to perceived quality issues, emphasizing the need for careful vetting of guest content.\u003c/p\u003e\n"],["\u003cp\u003eGoogle penalizes websites creating link-focused articles as they degrade the web's quality and user experience, recommending genuine content improvement instead.\u003c/p\u003e\n"],["\u003cp\u003eWebmasters receiving aggressive article submission requests are encouraged to report them to Google's spam report form.\u003c/p\u003e\n"]]],["Google has observed a rise in spammy links within guest, contributor, or syndicated posts. While these articles are acceptable when informative, they violate guidelines when primarily used for large-scale link building. Key indicators of violations include keyword-stuffed links, wide distribution across numerous sites, content from uninformed writers, and duplicate content. Google advises sites to carefully review articles, use `rel=\"nofollow\"` tags on questionable links, and focus on content quality over link acquisition to avoid impacting their website ranking negatively.\n"],null,["# A reminder about links in large-scale article campaigns\n\nThursday, May 25, 2017\n\n\nLately we've seen an increase in spammy links contained in articles referred to as contributor\nposts, guest posts, partner posts, or syndicated posts. These articles are generally written\nby or in the name of one website, and published on a different one.\n\n\nGoogle does not discourage these types of articles in the cases when they inform users,\neducate another site's audience or bring awareness to your cause or company. However, what does\nviolate [Google's guidelines on link schemes](/search/docs/essentials/spam-policies#link-spam)\nis when the main intent is to build links in a large-scale way back to the author's site. Below\nare factors that, when taken to an extreme, can indicate when an article is in violation of\nthese guidelines:\n\n- Stuffing keyword-rich links to your site in your articles\n- Having the articles published across many different sites; alternatively, having a large number of articles on a few large, different sites\n- Using or hiring article writers that aren't knowledgeable about the topics they're writing on\n- Using the same or similar content across these articles; alternatively, duplicating the full content of articles found on your own site (in which case use of [`rel=\"canonical\"`](/search/docs/crawling-indexing/consolidate-duplicate-urls), in addition to [`rel=\"nofollow\"`](/search/docs/advanced/guidelines/qualify-outbound-links), is advised)\n\n\nWhen Google detects that a website is publishing articles that contain spammy links, this may\nchange Google's perception of the quality of the site and could affect its ranking. Sites\naccepting and publishing such articles should carefully vet them, asking questions like: Do I know\nthis person? Does this person's message fit with my site's audience? Does the article contain\nuseful content? If there are links of questionable intent in the article, has the author used\n[`rel=\"nofollow\"`](/search/docs/advanced/guidelines/qualify-outbound-links)\non them?\n\n\nFor websites creating articles made for links, Google takes action on this behavior because\nit's bad for the Web as a whole. When link building comes first, the quality of the articles\ncan suffer and create a bad experience for users. Also, webmasters generally prefer not to\nreceive aggressive or repeated \"Post my article!\" requests, and we encourage such cases to be\nreported to our\n[spam report form](/search/docs/advanced/guidelines/report-spam?pli=1). And lastly, if\na link is a form of endorsement, and you're the one creating most of the endorsements for your own\nsite, is this putting forth the best impression of your site? Our best advice in relation to link\nbuilding is to focus on improving your site's content and everything---including links\n---will follow (no pun intended).\n\nPosted by the Google Webspam Team"]]